Method for implementing scheduling systems in discrete-continuous production: the case of oil refineries

System Analysis and Control
Authors:
Abstract:

This paper addresses the complex problem of production scheduling for continuous production facilities, such as oil refineries and petrochemical plants. The typical challenges of existing models are analyzed in detail, including the difficulty of accounting for all technological and logistic constraints, operational challenges, and the limited time available for schedule preparation and verification. As a solution, a five-step implementation methodology is proposed: 1) model aggregation to ensure solvability and accuracy, 2) selection of data updating methods (manual, semi-automated, or fully automated), 3) user adaptation through a structured planning process and automatic checks, 4) ensuring additivity between monthly plans based on linear programming and shift-daily schedules, and 5) automatic monitoring of plan and actual asynchrony to detect deviations. The methodology is embedded into the system implementation process, linking methodological principles with each project stage. It constitutes a replicable approach applicable to petrochemical and other continuous production facilities, ensuring the creation of a robust and adequate system capable of operating under the high dynamics and complexity of modern production.

  • References

    1. Petukhov M.Yu. On the Relevance of Implementation of the Automated System of Production and Supply Sheduling at Oil Refinery. Automation and Remote Control, 2018, Vol. 79, Pp. 1168–1174. DOI: 10.1134/S0005117918060140

    2. Shobrys D.E., White D.C. Planning, scheduling, and control systems: Why can they not work together. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2000, Vol. 24, No. 2–7, Pp. 163–173. DOI: 10.1016/S0098-1354(00)00508-1

    3. Lei D. Multi-objective production scheduling: A survey. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2009, Vol. 43, Pp. 926–938. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-008-1770-4

    4. Floudas C.A., Lin X. Mixed Integer Linear Programming in Process Scheduling: Modeling, Algorithms, and Applications. Annals of Operations Research, 2005, Vol. 139, Pp. 131–162. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-005-3446-x

    5. Zyngier D., Kelly J.D. Multi-Product Inventory Logistics Modeling in the Process Industries. In: Optimization and Logistics Challenges in the Enterprise (eds. W. Chaovalitwongse, K.C. Furman, P.M. Pardalos), 2009, Vol. 30, Pp. 61–95. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-88617-6_2

    6. Gurko A.V., Sotnikov V.V., Lisitsyn N.V. Imitatsionnoe modelirovanie operativnogo upravleniia proizvodstvom [Simulation modeling of operational production management]. Izvestiia Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriia: Informatsionnye sistemy i tekhnologii [Information Systems and Tech-nologies]. 2006. Vol. 1–2, Pp. 37–46.

    7. Shaidullin R.A., Khokhlov A.S., Prokazina M.V. Simulation models in oil refinery scheduling system. Automation in Industry, 2012, Vol. 10, Pp. 15–21.

    8. Pogorelov A.S. Imitatsionnoe modelirovanie: osnovnye podkhody i instrumental’nye sredstva [Simulation modeling: main approaches and tools]. Izvestiia Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriia: Informatsionnye sistemy i tekhnologii [Information Systems and Technologies], 2006, Vol. 1, No. 4, Pp. 168–173.

    9. Aonuma T., Nishi T., Takai E. An implementation of a decomposition-coordination approach to refinery production scheduling. International Journal of Production Research, 1983, Vol. 21, No. 6, Pp. 845–857. DOI: 10.1080/00207548308942417

    10. Váncza J., Kis T., Kovács A. Aggregation – the key to integrating production planning and scheduling. CIRP Annals, 2006, Vol. 53, No. 1, Pp. 377–380. DOI: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60720-3

    11. Antamoshkina E.A., Sharypova K.V. The heuristic algorithm for discrete production scheduling. Information Science and Control Systems, 2010, Vol. 23, No. 1, Pp. 67–73.

    12. Framinan J.M., Leisten R., Ruiz García R. Manufacturing Scheduling Systems: An integrated view on models, methods, and tools. London: Springer, 2014. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-6272-8

    13. Khokhlov A.S., Mishutin D.Yu., Baulin E.S. Realizatsiia sistem klassa APS dlia NPZ/NKHK i ikh ob"edinenii [Implementation of APS class systems for oil refineries/petrochemical complexes and their associations]. Upravlenie razvitiem krupnomasshtabnykh sistem [Managing the development of large-scale systems] (MLSD’2023): Proceedings of the 16th International conference, 2023, Pp. 94–103. DOI: 10.25728/mlsd.2023.0094

    14. Khokhlov A.S., Konnov A.I., Shaidullin R.A. Integrated approach to continuous production planning. Automation in Industry, 2015, Vol. 4, Pp. 36–40.

    15. Ermakov E. Application of hybrid methodologies in project management. Universum: Economics and Law, 2024, Vol. 119, No. 9, Pp. 15–20. DOI: 10.32743/UniLaw.2024.119.9.18167

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Previous articleNext article