Computing, Telecommunication and Control Информатика, телекоммуникации и управление 2687-0517 7 10.18721/JCSTCS.19207 Analysis of the influence of weighting coefficients in a significance metric for 3D scene objects in preliminary rendering optimization setup Анализ влияния коэффициентов метрики значимости объектов 3D-сцены для предварительной настройки оптимизации рендеринга 0009-0003-6281-6726 Chernyi Vitaliy vitaly.g.cherny@gmail.com 0000-0001-6650-6491 Bolsunovskaya Marina bolsun_hht@mail.ru Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University 30 06 2026 19 2 70 80

This paper presents an experimental analysis of the behavior of a significance metric for 3D scene objects used for preliminary rendering optimization setup in the Unity environment. The influence of three object characteristics is considered, from which the final significance metric is formed: geometric complexity (polygon count), spatial size, and the object’s potential as an occluder, calculated based on visibility analysis performed using ray casting. Combining these features with adjustable weights makes it possible to obtain a unified estimate of the potential importance of an object and its impact on rendering during the configuration of optimization approaches. The results show that geometric complexity provides strong separation of objects into groups, assigning 22.6% of the objects in the experimental scene to the high-significance category. The balanced configuration and the dominance of other coefficients individually demonstrate lower differentiation, yet accurately identify the most complex objects intentionally placed in the scene, while classifying over 70% of the remaining models as low-significance. Regardless of the chosen configuration, the method correctly identifies candidates clearly suitable for further optimization.

 computer graphics 3D scene analysis visibility analysis rendering optimization Unity engine References Koch J., Gomse M., Schüppstuhl T. Digital game-based examination for sensor placement in context of an Industry 4.0 lecture using the Unity 3D engine – a case study. Procedia Manufacturing, 2021, Vol. 55, Pp. 563–570. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2021.10.077 Anikeev A.S. Generating and modeling 2D terrain from control values using Unity in the C# programming language. Engineering Journal of Don, 2020, Vol. 64, No. 4, Art. no. 16. Krajčovič M., Gabajová G., Matys M., Grznár P., Dulina Ľ., Kohár R. 3D Interactive Learning Environment as a Tool for Knowledge Transfer and Retention. Sustainability, 2021, Vol. 13, No. 14, Art. no. 7916. DOI: 10.3390/su13147916 Helbig C., Becker A.M., Masson T., Mohamdeen A., Sen Ö.O., Schlink U. A game engine based application for visualising and analysing environmental spatiotemporal mobile sensor data in an urban context. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2022, Vol. 10, Art. no. 952725. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.952725 Wang Z., Wu G., Boriboonsomsin K., Barth M.J., Han K., Kim B., Tiwari P. Cooperative Ramp Merging System: Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation Using Game Engine. SAE International Journal of Con-nected and Automated Vehicles, 2019, Vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 115–126. DOI: 10.4271/12-02-02-0008 Geris A., Cukurbasi B., Kilinc M., Teke O. Balancing performance and comfort in virtual reality: A study of FPS, latency, and batch values. Software: Practice and Experience, 2024, Vol. 54, No. 12, Pp. 2336–2348. DOI: 10.1002/spe.3356 Gonakhchian V.I. Performance model of graphics pipeline for single-pass dynamic 3D scene rendering scheme. Proceedings of the Institute for System Programming of the RAS, 2020, Vol. 32, No. 4, Pp. 53–72. DOI: 10.15514/ISPRAS-2020-32(4)-4 Han S., Sander P.V. Triangle reordering for efficient rendering in complex scenes. Journal of Compu-ter Graphics Techniques, 2017, Vol. 6, No. 3, Pp. 38–52. Hasselgren J., Andersson M., Akenine-Möller T. Masked software occlusion culling. Proceedings of High Performance Graphics (HPG’16), 2016, pp. 23–31. DOI: 10.2312/hpg.20161189 Jiang T., Huang S., Yan Z. Rendering Optimization of Building Information Models Based on Occlusion Culling. Proceedings of the 2024 4th International Conference on Public Management and Big Data Analysis (PMBDA 2024), 2025, Pp. 358–368. DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-656-7_35 Pantazopoulos I., Tzafestas S. Occlusion culling algorithms: A comprehensive survey. Journal of Intel-ligent and Robotic Systems, 2002, Vol. 35, Pp. 123–156. DOI: 10.1023/A:1021175220384 Ye L., Liu G., Chen G., Li K., Chen Q., Fan W., Zhang J. 3D Model Occlusion Culling Optimization Method Based on WebGPU Computing Pipeline. Computer Systems Science and Engineering, 2023, Vol. 47, No. 2, Pp. 2529–2545. DOI: 10.32604/csse.2023.041488 Lee E.-S., Shin B.-S. Vertex Chunk-Based Object Culling Method for Real-Time Rendering in Metaverse. Electronics, 2023, Vol. 12, No. 12, Art. no. 2601. DOI: 10.3390/electronics12122601 Ding Y., Song Y. Vision-Degree-Driven Loading Strategy for Real-Time Large-Scale Scene Rende-ring. Computers, 2025, Vol. 14, No. 7, Art. no. 260. DOI: 10.3390/computers14070260 Kiusya Z., Gikunda P., Musumba G. Adaptive mesh compression algorithm for near real-time rendering of large-scale static scenes. 2025 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Computer, Data Sciences and Applications (ACDSA), 2025, Pp. 1–8. DOI: 10.1109/ACDSA65407.2025.11166552 Rossi A., Barbiero M., Scremin P., Carli R. Robust Visibility Surface Determination in Object Space via Plücker Coordinates. Journal of Imaging, 2021, Vol. 7, No. 6, Art. no. 96. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging7060096 Sun Y., Huang Q., Hsiao D.-Y., Guan L., Hua G. Learning view selection for 3D scenes. 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2021, Pp. 14459–14468. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01423 Nousias S., Arvanitis G., Lalos A., Moustakas K. Deep saliency mapping for 3D meshes and applications. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications, 2023, Vol. 19, No. 2, Art. no. 71. DOI: 10.1145/3550073 Nousias S., Arvanitis G., Lalos A., Moustakas K. Mesh saliency detection using convolutional neural networks. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), 2020, Pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/ICME46284.2020.9102796 Sarem M., Zheng Y., Wang K., Albshlawy L. An Improved Deep Learning Based RGB-D Saliency Detection Model. 2025 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Embedded Multicore/Many-core Systems-on-Chip (MCSoC), 2025, Pp. 105–112. DOI: 10.1109/MCSoC67473.2025.00027 Ullah I., Jian M., Hussain S., Guo J., Yu H., Wang X., Yin Y. A brief survey of visual saliency detection. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2020, Vol. 79, pp. 34605–34645. DOI: 10.1007/s11042-020-08849-y Lee C.H., Varshney A., Jacobs D.W. Mesh saliency. SIGGRAPH’05: ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Papers, 2005, Pp. 659–666. DOI: 10.1145/1186822.1073244 Vázquez P.P., Feixas M., Sbert M., Llobet A. Viewpoint entropy: a new tool for obtaining good views of molecules. Joint EUROGRAPHICS – IEEE TCVG Symposium on Visualization, 2002, Pp. 1–6. Genova K., Savva M., Chang A.X., Funkhouser T. Learning where to look: Data-driven viewpoint set selection for 3D scenes. arXiv:1704.02393, 2017. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1704.02393 Patney A., Salvi M., Kim J., Kaplanyan A., Wyman C., Benty N., Luebke D., Lefohn A. Towards foveated rendering for gaze-tracked virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 2016, Vol. 35, No. 6, Art. no. 179. DOI: 10.1145/2980179.2980246 Chernyi V.G., Bolsunovskaya M.V. Automation of object selection for rendering optimization in Unity. Razvitie intellektual'noi ekonomiki i promyshlennosti na osnove iskusstvennogo intellekta [Development of intel-lectual economy and industry based on artificial intelligence], 2025, Pp. 755–771. DOI: 10.18720/IEP/2025.3/36 Meister D., Ogaki S., Benthin C., Doyle M.J., Guthe M., Bittner J. A Survey on Bounding Volume Hierarchies for Ray Tracing. Computer Graphics Forum, 2021, Vol. 40, No. 2, Pp. 683–712. DOI: 10.1111/cgf.142662 Meister D., Bittner J. Performance Comparison of Bounding Volume Hierarchies for GPU Ray Tra-cing. Journal of Computer Graphics Techniques, 2022, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 1–19.