<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="ru">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Computing, Telecommunication and Control</journal-title>
        <trans-title-group xml:lang="ru">
          <trans-title>Информатика, телекоммуникации и управление</trans-title>
        </trans-title-group>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2687-0517</issn>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">3</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18721/JCSTCS.19203</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Survival analysis using Mahalanobis distance in Kernels of the Beran estimator</article-title>
        <trans-title-group xml:lang="ru">
          <trans-title>Анализ выживаемости с использованием расстояния Махаланобиса в ядрах модели Берана</trans-title>
        </trans-title-group>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-5637-1420</contrib-id>
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="scopus">7004013271</contrib-id>
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="researcherid">F-6480-2013</contrib-id>
          <name>
            <surname>Lev</surname>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
          <email>lev.utkin@mail.ru</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Konstantinov</surname>
            <given-names>Andrei</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/>
          <email>andrue.konst@gmail.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0003-2275-1473</contrib-id>
          <name>
            <surname>Kirpichenko</surname>
            <given-names>Stanislav</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/>
          <email>kirpichenko.sr@gmail.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-8749-9470</contrib-id>
          <name>
            <surname>Verbova</surname>
            <given-names>Natalia</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1">Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University</aff>
      <aff id="aff2">Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University</aff>
      <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-06-30">
        <day>30</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>31</fpage>
      <lpage>43</lpage>
      <abstract xml:lang="en">
        <p>Survival analysis is critical for modeling time-to-event data across medicine, engineering, and economics. The Beran estimator serves as an efficient nonparametric tool for estimating conditional survival functions under censoring. However, the conventional Beran estimator relies on the Euclidean distance for kernel weighting, a metric that fails to account for heterogeneous scales and correlations among covariates. This limitation can result in suboptimal weighting when features exhibit multicollinearity or varying measurement units. To address this, we propose the M-Beran estimator, a generalized formulation that incorporates the Mahalanobis distance into the kernel smoothing scheme. This modification ensures scale invariance and leverages the underlying correlation structure of the feature space, transforming the kernel into an elliptically symmetric form. We evaluate the proposed method through numerical experiments on real-world survival datasets. Results demonstrate that the M-Beran estimator outperforms the conventional Euclidean-distance-based Beran estimator, offering improved predictive accuracy.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>machine learning</kwd>
        <kwd>survival analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>Beran estimator</kwd>
        <kwd>Mahalanobis distance</kwd>
        <kwd>Harrell’s C-index</kwd>
        <kwd>survival function</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Cox D.R. Analysis of survival data. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2018.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hosmer D.W., Lemeshow S., May S. Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data. New Jersey: John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2008. DOI: 10.1002/9780470258019</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tattar P., Vaman H.J. Survival Analysis. NY: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2022. DOI: 10.1201/97810-03306979</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wang P., Li Y., Reddy C.K. Machine Learning for Survival Analysis: A Survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 2019, Vol. 51, No. 6, Art. no. 110. DOI: 10.1145/3214306</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Beran R. Nonparametric regression with randomly censored survival data, 1981.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Cox D.R. Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodo-logical), 1972, Vol. 34, No. 2. Pp. 187–220. DOI: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Berrendero J.R., Bueno-Larraz B., Cuevas A. On Mahalanobis Distance in Functional Settings. Jour-nal of Machine Learning Research, 2020, Vol. 21, Pp. 1–33.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dabrowska D.M. Non-Parametric Regression with Censored Survival Time Data. Scandinavian Jour-nal of Statistics, 1987, Vol. 14, No. 3, Pp. 181–197.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dabrowska D.M. Uniform Consistency of the Kernel Conditional Kaplan–Meier Estimate. The Annals of Statistics, 1989, Vol. 17, No. 3, Pp. 1157–1167.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ma Q., Zeng L., Tu S., Xu L. Kernel Mean Matching with Mahalanobis Distance for Causal Inference of Time-to-event Outcome. 2022 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), 2022, Pp. 509–514. DOI: 10.1109/BIBM55620.2022.9995021</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Baghfalaki T., Ganjali M., Berridge D. Robust joint modeling of longitudinal measurements and time to event data using normal/independent distributions: a Bayesian approach. Biometrical Journal, 2013, Vol. 55, No. 6, Pp. 844–865. DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201200272</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Baghfalaki T., Ganjali M., Hashemi R. Bayesian joint modeling of longitudinal measurements and time-to-event data using robust distributions. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 2014, Vol. 24, No. 4, Pp. 834–855. DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2014.903657</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Liu M., Legault V., Fülöp T., Côté A.-M., Gravel D., Blanchet F.G., Leung D.L., Lee S.J., Nakaza-to Y., Cohen A.A. Prediction of mortality in hemodialysis patients using moving multivariate distance. Frontiers in Physiology, 2021, Vol. 12, Art. no. 612494. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.612494</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Roblin E., Cournède P.-H., Michiels S. Evaluation of machine-learning models to measure individualized treatment effects from randomized clinical trial data with time-to-event outcomes. arXiv:2506.12277, 2025. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.12277</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Maas C.C.H.M., Kent D.M., Hughes M.C., Dekker R., Lingsma H.F., van Klaveren D. Performance metrics for models designed to predict treatment effect. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2023, Vol. 23, Art. no. 165. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-01974-w</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">De Maesschalck R., Jouan-Rimbaud D., Massart D.L. The Mahalanobis distance. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2000, Vol. 50, No. 1, Pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-7439(99)00047-7</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Anthony H., Kamnitsas K. On the use of Mahalanobis distance for out-of-distribution detection with neural networks for medical imaging. Uncertainty for Safe Utilization of Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (UNSURE 2023), 2023, Vol. 14291, Pp. 136–146. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-44336-7_14</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Cabana E., Lillo R.E., Laniado H. Multivariate outlier detection based on a robust Mahalanobis distance with shrinkage estimators. Statistical Papers, 2021, Vol. 62, Pp. 1583–1609. DOI: 10.1007/s00362-019-01148-1</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Colombo P., Dadalto E., Staerman G., Noiry N., Piantanida P. Beyond Mahalanobis distance for tex-tual OOD detection. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022, Vol. 35, P. 17744–17759.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Podolskiy A., Lipin D., Bout A., Artemova E., Piontkovskaya I. Revisiting Mahalanobis distance for transformer-based out-of-domain detection. Proceedings of the 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2021, Vol. 35, No. 35, Pp. 13675–13682.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Brown P.O., Chiang M.C., Guo S., Jin Y., Leung C.K., Murray E.L., Pazdor A.G.M., Cuzzocrea A. Mahalanobis distance based k-means clustering. Big Data Analytics and Knowledge Discovery, 2022, Vol. 13-428, Pp. 256–262. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-12670-3_23</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Nielsen S., Abdullaev L., Teo R., Nguyen T.M. Elliptical attention. 38th Conference in Neural Informa-tion Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2024, Pp. 1–42.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wiegrebe S., Kopper P., Sonabend R., Bischl B., Bender A. Deep learning for survival analysis: a review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2024, Vol. 57, Art. no. 65. DOI: 10.1007/s10462-023-10681-3</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kaplan E.L., Meier P. Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations. Journal of the Ame-rican Statistical Association, 1958, Vol. 53, No. 282, P. 457–481. DOI: 10.2307/2281868</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Van der Maaten L., Hinton G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2008, Vol. 9, No. 86, P. 2579–2605.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
